![]() |
|
Carbon Tax Anti-Growth |
|
The case for action other than no-regrets policies to combat global warming is still far from clear. Moreover, the new tax does not protect our environment as claimed. The Kyoto measures will have only a minuscule impact on global warming and New Zealand is far too small an economy to make a difference. Even if there were a robust case for action, the governments response is incoherent. It has overlooked the advice in the McLeod Tax Review of 2001 that such a tax would be difficult to integrate with Negotiated Greenhouse Agreements, should cover the agriculture sector, and should not be imposed before 2008. From an economic growth perspective, a carbon charge is a distorting tax which can only be partially remedied by recycling revenue from it. In addition, it will harm New Zealands international competitiveness, contrary to the governments claim, and put New Zealand policies further at odds with the policy directions of two key trading partners, Australia and the United States, neither of which has signed the Kyoto Protocol. Measures to alleviate the impact of Kyoto ratification on the economy by using forestry sinks and shielding certain industries are only short-term palliatives. In time the governments policies imply drastic action to cut emissions at large costs to growth. The lack of certainty about policies beyond 2012 will mean that long-term investment will be discouraged. The only way the governments decision can be made consistent with its top priority goal of raising New Zealands growth rate to return New Zealand to the top half of the OECD income rankings is to adopt other vigorous pro-growth policies. The business sector is seeing no sign of these emerging, Mr Kerr said. |
|
For more information, contact: Roger Kerr |